[Themaintainers] One Laptop Per Child's $100 Laptop Was Going To Change The World — Then It All Went Wrong

[Camille E. Acey]

Agreed! I would definitely buy this book or watch this documentary. 
Thanks for sharing your experience and insight, Bastien. 
Gosh, this community is full of fascinating people and inspiring stories!
Camille
Camille E. Acey
"Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare." - Audre Lorde
-------- Original message --------From: Lee Vinsel <lee.vinsel at gmail.com> Date: 5/1/18  8:12 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: Bastien <bzg at bzg.fr> Cc: "Camille E. Acey" <connect at camilleacey.com>, Themaintainers <themaintainers at lists.stevens.edu> Subject: Re: [Themaintainers] One Laptop Per Child's $100 Laptop Was Going To Change The World — Then It All Went Wrong 
Bastien,
Thanks so much for these fascinating stories and examples. I agree that OPLC would make a great study, especially if it got into these implementation issues, including maintenance, and especially if it looked at different places in the world. Could make a great book or dissertation . . . 
I appreciate you shining more light on it for us. 
Lee
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:07 AM, Bastien <bzg at bzg.fr> wrote:
Hi Lee and all,



Lee Vinsel <lee.vinsel at gmail.com> writes:



> I was just looking into OPLC nostalgically a few weeks ago and

> thinking about it as a clear example solutionism.



I worked for OLPC as a contractor in 2008 for a few months, helping

Haïti to implement its OLPC program.  I helped the local OLPC team

writing contents and activities for teachers and children, designing

workshops to let teachers know what to do with the XOs, translating

the Sugar platform into haitian creole, etc.



Then I started OLPC France (https://olpc-france.org) toegether with a

few friends and we still exist today as a small and friendly group of

teachers, developers, researchers, hardware hackers, etc.



The article is quite balanced, but let me insist on a few facts.



The first one is that XO laptops from 2008 are still working.  Yes,

the article says it, but I think its deserves a lot more of attention,

especially on this list.



The second fact is that OLPC programs were mostly led by governments,

most of them well aware of maintainance problems.  Thus, all sort of

maintainance solutions were invented for and I'd love to see someone

getting out there on the ground and listing them.  For example, in

Uruguay, they had a bus traveling the country to fix laptops, with a

mix of paid employees and unpaid volunteers.



The third fact is that OLPC brought small changes in many areas, most

of them really invisible because they are just "cultural".  E.g. OLPC

programs were often a unique opportunity for ministries of education

and ministries of [transport/electricity/[infrastructure]] to work

together, which brings all kind of political problems but which also

encourages collaboration in places that are strategic.  For example in

Rwanda, they first failed to anticipate the needs for electricity then

worked on it and fixed this.  Same in Uruguay for connectivity, where

the government agencies worked with local cooperatives to ensure the

Internet connection was used for schools and other local activities.



Also, OLPC grassroots in many countries were a unique opportunity to

have teachers discuss with hackers and free software developers, as we

continue to do at OLPC France, developing https://sugarizer.org, or at

OLPC San Francisco, where they recently held a hackathon on "open data

for education" (https://www.olpcsf.org).



All this was made possibile by two things: OLPC being "open source"

since the beginning and OLPC encouraging grassroots organizations.



So, I don't argue that OLPC did not have its share of solutionism but

I would say that this was not "by design".  Negroponte was trying very

hard to sell his ideas and he probably relied too much on solutionist

expectations of his audience -- but the ones who implemented OLPC on

the ground were confronted with real maintainance problems on a daily

basis and solutionism is not an option here.  Collaboration is.  And

many kinds of collaboration were possible thanks to OLPC being open

and Sugar being a free software.



Anyway, I don't want to defend a program that's now history, just to

expand the views on its diversity, and the diversity of its outcome.



All best,



-- 

 Bastien




-- 
Assistant Professor 
Department of Science and Technology in Society
Virginia Tech
leevinsel.com
Twitter: @STS_News


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.stevens.edu/pipermail/themaintainers/attachments/20180501/9d1fb903/attachment.html>